Not long ago,
several of us attended an Apple Camp intended to push our thinking in regard to
classroom iPad use. The facilitator quickly got us started with some of the
basic navigation techniques, and then led us through an exercise where we built
our own textbooks using an assorted of pre-loaded "widgets" and
content. Frankly, it was mesmerizing, and your mind does start to wheel with
all the possible ways you could use this equipment to engage students.
In the following
weeks, and in anticipation of our school receiving $25,000 worth of
technology from Staples Canada for winning their environmental contest, we have
been discussing what we should do next to take our tech profile to the next
level and best prepare our school for the next stages of the BC Education Plan.
We now have current Mac and PC labs, four Smartboards (probably not used to their potential) and
several small computer stations around the building. Upgrading our underpowered library
machines is a must as they are needed for both research and content generation
and the labs are not always available or convenient for student use. We would
also like more projectors and document cameras, as these are well used in our
school and they are definitely pushing practice and learning forward. The wireless with the student partition and our new BYOD program seem to be working. Whether
or not to jump into the iPad phenomenon now seems to be the salient question.
The teachers that
attended the Apple session with me wanted more practice time with the iPads so
I did go to the store and threw my own credit card down, bought several units,
and have started a mini lending library to augment the single unit we bought
last spring. A new laptop is also on the way with the Lion OS, which will synch
all the machines using a school account to download applications. We will be
compiling a list of apps that we want to try and the intention is to put these new
pre-loaded iPad2s in the hands of interested teachers when they go out the door
this summer. How many units we get in the building depends on teacher interest
and the will of the newly formed tech committee.
Here is the
exciting part:
The conversations
about practice have started to ramp up again with the prospect of these devices
being available. Teachers are starting to talk about their favorite science and
math apps and how to integrate them into their classroom. PE teachers are
talking about using the video ability to film skills and then sit and offer
immediate feedback side-by-side with students (and then players on sports
teams) and show the exemplars up on the big tv in regular speed and slow
motion, maybe even with John Madden-like telestration. The English and drama
classes can use them to film and edit scenes and easily share content using
Apple TV, and socials classes can start to use them to build and share their
Historical Fair projects instead of or in addition to the usual posters and
kiosks and laptop displays. The ability to dive into project-based learning is huge, of course. Maybe we can run that Film Making class and use them there? We are already using the iPad in the LA room quite
often and the potential there for literacy support is also really impressive.
Talking about learning is the favorite part of my job, and the buzz this
opportunity is creating is really positive. Sounds fantastic, right?
Here are my
concerns:
The iPad1 doesn't
have a camera and it won't mirror to Apple TV so you need the iPad2 at the very
least. These are about $400 per unit right now, and if you buy a set of 30 that
is $12,000. Add in three or 4 MacBook Airs to synch the tablets, another
projector, Apple TV, and the required taxes, and you are heading towards the
$20,000 mark pretty darn quickly. The lifespan on any electronic equipment is
finite, so you might expect to start replacing the set in 4-5 years, not to
mention any accidental damage, assorted glitches, and theft. I expect schools
that use these in a 1:1 format or via mobile labs must enact a complex series
of practices to mitigate against these concerns. Further to all of this,
when I was picking up our iPad2s at the store, the manager was busily trying to
upsell me to the newly released iPad3, which with the extra pre-loaded memory
was close to $600 w taxes. "You don't want the extra memory?"
she asked, curious that I would not want the very best item they offered for my
school. "Uh, most people are still at this stage," I said, making the
little scrunchy gesture suggesting the “five-finger” navigation move. The
concept of the "tech treadmill" can be a little un-nerving, as you
are caught in a dilemma between making a purchase today and missing out on the next
exciting upgrade that comes out tomorrow, or conversely, overspending now
knowing that within mere months the price will drop as the next latest items
come out! Aarrgh.
It is very
important to remember that Apple is a business first and foremost, and as much
as some individuals in the organization may be truly excited about learning,
their motivation is primarily mercantile. Our school system has a lot of
needs to meet and we must always be thoughtful about how we spend our limited resources.
My own interest is not just in engaging students in a medium that works for
them, but also in finding ways to move their learning deeper. Collecting
content into a digital textbook might be fun and easy, but unless they are
moving through Bloom's Taxonomy while interacting with
the material and actually pushing their own thinking and understanding forward,
I have to question the cost and the value. Also, my role as principal is to make sure the
conversations about instruction keep moving forward, that we are heading
in a direction that will meet the expectations of the new BC Education Plan,
and that we are getting the most learning per dollar spent. On an individual note, this recent endeavour
will be a nice warm-up for a new position I've accepted in another district
where we will be grappling with the very same issues, albeit on a much larger
scale.
At this point I
believe the quality of the Apple programs and ubiquity of the entire product line
makes the iPad extremely relevant to our learners, and if we don't at least dip
our toe in these waters, build our own skill sets, and start to provide these opportunities
for our kids even on a limited level, we are doing them somewhat of a disservice. Whether
we want to dive in fully or not after testing the temperature still remains to be seen.
Further
opinions on iPad use and other ways to meet students' tech needs:
Pete,
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to see how expenses creep up when you add iPads.
I hear you with regards to "when" to jump into the new tech, given the quick turnover these days with the latest and greatest.
Interestingly Apple now offers lease opportunities. Check it out at: http://store.apple.com/ca/browse/campaigns/lease
With regards to assessing whether tech is the right choice for a school, i like the following quote taken from: Melhuish, K. & Falloon, G. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Leading, Technology, 22(3). Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/5050/Looking%20to%20the%20future.pdf?sequence=1
"However, of greater importance is that
effective, evidence-driven, innovative practices, combined with a clear-sighted
assessment of the advantages and limitations of any product, should take priority over
the device itself."
However, as you mentioned in one of your other posts nobody seems to want to read this stuff, thus it may not be too important. :)
Dom